协同治理框架下乡村内源式发展的嵌入式驱动机制与建设模式以屏南县龙潭村艺术乡建为例

Embedded Driving Mechanisms and Construction Modes of Endogenous Development in Rural Areas Under the Framework of Collaborative GovernanceA Case Study of Artistic Countryside Construction in Longtan Village of Pingnan County

  • 摘要:
    目的/意义 在艺术乡建实践中,常因主体性悖论导致外源式发展与内源式发展的双重失效。文章旨在通过揭示协同治理框架下乡村内源式发展的嵌入式驱动机制与建设模式,应对乡村振兴中资源悬浮与主体疏离的治理困境,为推动乡村真正实现可持续的内生发展提供理论参考与实践路径。
    方法/过程 基于嵌入理论与协同理论构建分析框架,以福建省屏南县龙潭村作为典型案例,综合运用深度访谈、参与式观察等研究方法,揭示嵌入式协同助推乡村内源式发展的运行机制,剖析多元主体从单向管理到合作共治的演变过程。
    结果/结论 结果显示,在政治、经济、文化资源及外部主体的双重嵌入下,乡村可实现新内生性发展的资源积累。通过重塑村民主体性、重构传统空间与融合现代文明、发展传统产业与新业态、构建制度化合作网络等措施,实现对外部嵌入资源的内生整合。多元主体间的有机联动进一步激发出乡村新内生性发展动能,最终促成从“输血”到“造血”发展模式的根本转变。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective/Meaning  In the practice of artistic rural construction, the paradox of subjectivity often leads to the double failure of both exogenous development and endogenous development. By revealing the embedded driving mechanism and construction mode of endogenous development in rural areas under the framework of collaborative governance, the study aimed to deal with the governance dilemma of resource floatation and subject alienation in rural revitalization, in order to provide theoretical reference and practical path for promoting the sustainable endogenous development of rural areas.
    Methods/Procedures  Based on the embedded theory and synergetic theory, an analytical framework was constructed. Then, by taking Longtan Village in Pingnan County, Fujian Province as the typical case, the research methods such as in-depth interviews and participatory observation were used to reveal the operating mechanism of embedded collaboration in promoting the endogenous development in rural areas, and analyze the evolution process of multiple subjects from one-way management to cooperative governance.
    Results/Conclusions  The results showed that under the double embedding of political, economic, cultural resources and external subjects, the rural areas could realize the resource accumulation of new endogenous development. By reshaping the subjectivity of villagers, reconstructing the traditional space and integrating the modern civilization, developing the traditional industries and new formats, and constructing the institutionalized cooperation network, the endogenous integration of external embedded resources could be realized. The organic interaction between multiple subjects further stimulated the new endogenous development momentum in rural areas, ultimately contributed to the fundamental transformation from “blood transfusion” to “blood production” mode.

     

/

返回文章
返回