乡村振兴背景下莆田乡土文化与生态旅游融合发展路径分析

Analysis on the Integrated Development Path of Putian’s Vernacular Culture and Ecotourism Under the Background of Rural Revitalization

  • 摘要:
    目的/意义 在乡村振兴战略背景下,乡土文化与生态旅游的融合发展成为推动乡村可持续发展的重要路径。莆田市作为妈祖文化发源地,拥有丰富的文化遗产和生态资源。通过探讨以文化振兴和生态振兴促进乡村发展的方式,为闽台融合提供示范。
    方法/过程 采用文献分析、案例研究和实地调研方法,梳理莆田市的乡土文化特征及生态旅游发展现状,重点分析妈祖文化、莆仙戏、传统工艺等在生态旅游中的作用。同时,归纳当前发展过程中存在的问题,如文化挖掘不足、产品同质化、村民参与度低以及两岸合作机制缺乏,并提出优化策略。
    结果/结论 研究发现,莆田市在乡土文化与生态旅游融合方面具备独特优势,但亟需解决文化保护与开发失衡、旅游产品创新不足、社区参与薄弱等问题。建议构建“文化为魂、生态为基、旅游为体”的发展模式,推动非遗活化、文旅品牌建设、智慧旅游发展及村集体经济参与,同时深化闽台文化合作,以提升文化认同感和经济可持续性,助力乡村振兴与两岸融合发展。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective/Meaning  Under the background of rural revitalization strategy, the integrated development of vernacular culture and ecotourism has become an important way to promote the sustainable development of rural areas. As the place of origin for Mazu culture, Putian City has rich cultural heritage and ecological resources. By exploring the ways to promote rural development through the cultural revitalization and ecological revitalization, it could provide a demonstration for the integration of Fujian and Taiwan.
    Methods/Procedures  By using the methods of literature analysis, case study and field investigation, the characteristics of vernacular culture and the current situation of ecotourism development in Putian City were sorted out, and the role of Mazu culture, Puxian opera and traditional crafts in ecotourism was emphatically analyzed. At the same time, the problems existing in the current development process were also summarized, such as insufficient cultural excavation, product homogeneity, low participation of villagers and lack of cross-strait cooperation mechanism. Then, the corresponding optimization strategies were put forward.
    Results/Conclusions  The study found that Putian City had special advantages in the integration of vernacular culture and ecotourism, but it was urgent to solve the problems of imbalance between cultural protection and development, insufficient innovation of tourism products, and weak community participation. The countermeasures were put forward including building the development model of “culture as the soul, ecology as the foundation and tourism as the medium”, promoting the activation of intangible cultural heritage, the construction of cultural tourism brand, the development of smart tourism and the participation of village collective economy, as well as deepening the cultural cooperation between Fujian and Taiwan, thus to enhance the cultural recognition and economic sustainability, and to help the rural revitalization and the cross-strait integrated development.

     

/

返回文章
返回