农村集体股份经济合作社创新发展的SWOT分析以福建省古田县为例

SWOT Analysis of the Innovative Development of Rural Collective Economic CooperativesA Case Study of Gutian County, Fujian Province

  • 摘要:
    目的/意义 农村集体股份经济合作社是壮大农村集体经济、推进乡村振兴的核心抓手。针对县域村合作社“挂牌易、运营难”的共性困境,研究以福建省古田县为例,分析其内外部发展条件,探索从形式化存续向实质性运营转型的有效路径,为同类地区提供实践参照。
    方法/过程 以福建省古田县280家村合作社为样本,运用SWOT分析法其内生优势劣势与外部机遇挑战,识别“优势—机遇共振、劣势—挑战叠加”特征,从产业协同、企社联动、服务赋能、抱团发展等4个维度,构建差异化“村合作社+”协同路径,并明确各路径的责任主体与落地要求。
    结果/结论 研究表明,古田县村合作社整体处于形式化存续向实质性运营过渡阶段,治理架构失衡、财务分账迟滞等内生劣势与资产盘活低效、人才外流等外部挑战相互传导,彼此掣肘,是制约其提质增效的核心症结。所构建的4类协同模式可有效破解这一结构性发展矛盾,推动治理机制、运营能力与产业体系协同升级。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective/Meaning  The rural collective share economic cooperatives are the core of strengthening the rural collective economy and promoting the rural revitalization. In view of the common dilemma of “easy listing and difficult operation” of county-level village cooperatives, Gutian County of Fujian Province was taken as an example to analyze its internal and external development conditions, explore an effective path from formal existence to substantive operation transformation, and provide practical reference for the similar regions.
    Methods/Procedures  By taking 280 village cooperatives in Gutian County as the sample, the SWOT analysis method was used to analyze the advantages, disadvantages, external opportunities and challenges. Then, the characteristics of “advantage-opportunity resonance, disadvantage-challenge superposition” were identified. From the four dimensions of industrial synergy, enterprise-society linkage, service empowerment and huddle-up development, the differentiated “village cooperative + ” collaborative paths were constructed, and the responsibility subject and implementation requirements of each path were clarified.
    Results/Conclusions  The results showed that: the village cooperatives in Gutian County as a whole were in the transition stage from formal existence to substantive operation. The core crux of restricting its quality and efficiency improvement was the mutual conduction and restriction between the endogenous disadvantages such as the imbalance of governance structure and the lag of financial division and the external challenges such as the inefficiency of asset revitalization and the outflow of talents. The four types of collaborative models constructed could effectively solve the contradiction of structural development, and promote the coordinated upgrading of governance mechanism, operation ability and industrial system.

     

/

返回文章
返回