农村集体股份经济合作社创新发展的SWOT分析以福建省古田县为例

SWOT Analysis of Innovative Development in Rural Collective Share-holding Cooperatives: A Case Study of Gutian County, Fujian Province

  • 摘要:
    目的/意义 农村集体股份经济合作社是壮大农村集体经济、推进乡村振兴的核心抓手。针对县域村合作社“挂牌易、运营难”的共性困境,研究以福建省古田县为例,分析其内外部发展条件,探索从形式化存续向实质性运营转型的有效路径,为同类地区提供实践参照。
    方法/过程 以古田县280家村合作社为样本,运用SWOT分析法其生优势劣势与外部机遇挑战,识别“优势—机遇共振、劣势—挑战叠加”特征,从产业协同、企社联动、服务赋能、抱团发展等4个维度,构建差异化“村合作社+”协同路径,并明确各路径的责任主体与落地要求。
    结果/结论 研究表明,古田县村合作社整体处于形式化存续向实质性运营过渡阶段,治理架构失衡、财务分账迟滞等内生劣势与资产盘活低效、人才外流等外部挑战相互传导制约,是制约其提质增效的核心症结。所构建的四类协同模式可有效破解结构性发展矛盾,推动治理机制、运营能力与产业体系协同升级。

     

    Abstract: Rural collective share-holding cooperatives (RCSHCs) are the core organizational carriers for consolidating rural collective economies and advancing rural revitalization in China. However, county-level RCSHCs universally confront a “registration-operation dilemma”: formal establishment is straightforward, yet substantive operation remains elusive. As a pilot county for rural property rights reform in Fujian Province, Gutian County has established 280 village-level RCSHCs with 353,000 members, but it still grapples with governance irregularities, delayed financial account separation (pilot coverage <2%), and inefficient resource activation—bottlenecks that hinder the shift from nominal existence to operational effectiveness.This study employs a SWOT framework to systematically analyze 280 village cooperatives in Gutian County, unpacking internal strengths (local resource endowments, efficient policy uptake, and strong market demand alignment) and weaknesses (governance imbalances, lagging financial decentralization, and weak member participation). Externally, it identifies escalating policy support, mature multi-agent collaboration models, and digital empowerment as key opportunities, alongside threats of inefficient asset activation, talent outflow, and property right risks.The SWOT analysis reveals a dual dynamic: strengths-opportunities resonance and weaknesses-threats overlap. Drawing on this, the study develops four differentiated “Village Cooperative +” collaboration models (industrial synergy, enterprise linkage, service empowerment, and collective scaling), each with clear roles and implementation protocols. These models effectively mitigate structural bottlenecks, promote governance standardization, operational upgrading, and industrial integration, and unlock collective resource value.The study’s core contribution lies in integrating SWOT insights with local realities to design context-specific strategies, translating analytical findings into actionable pathways that bridge the gap between institutional design and grassroots implementation. This provides a replicable blueprint for county-level RCSHCs to achieve high-quality development under rural revitalization.

     

/

返回文章
返回