农户绿色素养水平的影响因素及其提升路径分析以兵团第一师职工为例

Analysis on the Influencing Factors Of Farmers’ Green Literacy Level and its Promotion Path: Taking the Staff of the First Division of the Corps as an Example

  • 摘要:
    目的/意义 考察兵团职工绿色素养水平及其影响因素,不仅有助于提升职工的环保意识和行为能力,还能为兵团生态文明建设提供科学依据和实践指导,为推动区域可持续发展提供参考。
    方法/过程 基于2024年7—8月于兵团第一师402份的微观调研数据,在将“生态价值观”纳入常规绿色素养评价框架进行测度的基础上,使用多元回归模型和解释结构模型,探究兵团职工绿色素养水平的影响因素及其层级结构。
    结果/结论 研究发现:(1)一团和十六团职工的绿色素养均值最高,分别达到0.695和0.690;(2)职工受教育程度、村干部身份、家庭成员外出打工人数、家庭年总收入、拥有的地块数量、加入农村专业合作社、使用现代媒介获取信息频率、与本村人交流频率以及朋友信任感知对绿色素养水平的影响显著为正,职工经营的耕地面积对绿色素养水平的影响显著为负;(3)是否加入合作社、与本村人交流频率与家庭年收入是直接制约因素;使用现代媒介获取信息频率、外出打工人数、耕地面积以及地块数量是间接制约因素;受教育程度、村干部身份以及对朋友信任程度是根本制约因素;(4)形成了3条绿色素养水平的提升路径,分别是:由“受教育程度→使用现代媒介获取信息频率→是否加入合作社→职工绿色素养水平”构建的教育驱动型路径;由“村干部身份→耕地面积、地块数量→与本村人交流→职工绿色素养水平”构建的行政资源型路径;由“对朋友信任程度→外出务工人数→家庭年总收入→职工绿色素养水平”构建的社会资本循环路径。

     

    Abstract:
    Purpose/Significance Investigating the green literacy level of corps workers and its influencing factors not only helps to improve the environmental awareness and behavior ability of workers, but also provides scientific basis and practical guidance for the construction of ecological civilization in corps, which is of great significance to promote regional sustainable development.
    Method/Process  This paper uses 402 micro-survey data from July to August 2024 in the first division of the Corps. Based on the measurement of ‘ecological values’ into the conventional green literacy evaluation framework, this paper uses multiple regression model and explanatory structure model to explore the influencing factors and hierarchical structure of the green literacy level of the Corps employees.
    Result/Conclusion  The study found that: (1) The average values of green literacy of employees in the first and sixteenth regiments are the highest, reaching 0.695 and 0.690 respectively. (2) The education level of employees, the identity of village cadres, the number of migrant workers, the total annual income of the family, the number of plots owned, the frequency of joining rural professional cooperatives, the frequency of using modern media to obtain information, the frequency of communication with the villagers and the trust perception of friends have a significant positive impact on the level of green literacy, and the cultivated land area operated by employees has a significant negative impact on the level of green literacy. (3) Whether to join cooperatives, the frequency of communication with the villagers and the annual income of the family are the direct constraints; the frequency of using modern media to obtain information, the number of migrant workers, the area of cultivated land and the number of plots are indirect constraints; the degree of education, the identity of village cadres and the degree of trust in friends are the fundamental constraints. (4) There are three paths to improve the level of green literacy: the education-driven path constructed by ‘education level→ the frequency of using modern media to obtain information→ whether to join cooperatives→ the level of green literacy of workers’, the administrative resource path constructed by ‘village cadre identity→ cultivated land area, number of plots→ communication with villagers→ the level of green literacy of workers’, and the social capital cycle path constructed by ‘degree of trust in friends → number of migrant workers → total annual household income → the level of green literacy of workers’.

     

/

返回文章
返回