台湾地区技术移转实践及其对闽台科技协同创新的启示

Practice of Technology Transfer in Taiwan and Its Implications to the Collaborative Innovation of Science and Technology Between Fujian and Taiwan

  • 摘要:
    目的/意义 中国台湾地区技术移转(大陆称“技术转移”)起步较早、体系成熟,系统梳理其制度设计与运作经验,对破解两岸技术转移规则障碍、推进两岸融合发展示范区建设具有重要参考价值。
    方法/过程 基于制度分析与案例研究方法,从政策体系、服务机构、运作方式及典型模式四个维度解构台湾技术移转生态,提炼其核心经验。
    结果/结论 台湾技术移转形成“上位法—专项法—部门规章”三层制度架构,以创作人高比例收益分配、税负递延激励、人员流动松绑为核心驱动机制;构建研发法人、高校技转中心、政府平台、市场化机构四类主体协同的服务生态;涌现出工业技术研究院枢纽桥接、台湾大学市场治理、成功大学梯度孵化等典型模式。借鉴其经验,闽台科技协同创新应从制度衔接、平台共建、人才共育、标准共通四维路径推进。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective/Meaning The technology transfer in Taiwan, China, started early and has a mature system. A systematic review of its institutional design and operational experience holds significant reference value for overcoming the barriers of cross-strait technology transfer regulations and promoting the construction of cross-strait integrated development demonstration zone.
    Methods/Procedures Based on the institutional analysis and case study methods, the technology transfer ecosystem of Taiwan was deconstructed from four dimensions: policy system, service institution, operation mode and typical mode, and then its core experience was extracted.
    Results/Conclusions  The technology transfer in Taiwan has formed a three-level institutional framework of “organic law-specialized legislation-departmental regulations”, with the core driving mechanisms of high-proportion income distribution for creators, tax deferred incentives, and relaxed restrictions on personnel mobility. It has built a collaborative service ecosystem of four types of entities: R&D institutions (as legal entities), university technology transfer centers, government platforms, and market-oriented institutions. The typical models such as the hub bridging of industrial technology research institutes, market-oriented governance of Taiwan University, and gradient incubation of Cheng Kung University have emerged. Drawing on its experience, the collaborative innovation of science and technology between Fujian and Taiwan should be promoted from the four-dimensional path of institutional cohesion, platform co-construction, talent co-education and standard commonness.

     

/

返回文章
返回