台湾地区社区营造的经验及其对大陆实施乡村振兴战略的启示

Experience in Community Building in the Taiwan Region and Its Implications for the Implementation of the Rural Revitalization Strategy in Mainland China

  • 摘要:
    目的/意义 大陆乡村振兴面临行政化倾向、居民参与不足、产业同质化等挑战,台湾社区营造30余年实践积累了成熟经验,梳理其发展脉络、经验与困境,可为大陆乡村振兴提供理论与实践参考,助力破解乡村发展难题。
    方法/过程 以台湾社区营造“人、文、地、产、景”核心框架为切入点,系统剖析其政策、主体、行动策略等核心经验,反思其发展中的现实困境,结合大陆国情构建“经验提炼—困境反思—启示转化”分析框架,探索本土化实践路径。
    结果/结论 台湾社区营造形成政民与专业力量协同的模式,有效应对乡村发展问题,但存在政策碎片化、过度依赖补助等问题;大陆需立足国情,从政策、主体、产业、文化、生态五维度借鉴经验、规避教训,构建协同发展的本土化路径,推动乡村振兴内生发展。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective/Meaning  The rural revitalization in Mainland China faces the challenges such as administrative tendency, insufficient participation of residents, and industrial homogenization. Taiwan has accumulated mature experience in community building for more than 30 years. By combing its development context, experience and dilemma, it can provide theoretical and practical reference for the revitalization of rural areas in Mainland China, helping to solve the problems of rural development.
    Methods/Procedures By taking the core framework of “people, culture, place, industry, and landscape” built in Taiwan region’s community as the starting point, its core experience such as policy, stakeholders, and strategic actions was systematically analyzed, and the realistic dilemma in its development was reflected on. Based on the national conditions of the Mainland China, an analytical framework of “experience refinement-dilemma reflection-insight transformation” was constructed to explore the pathways of localization practice.
    Results/Conclusions  The Taiwan region’s community building has established a model of collaboration between government, civil society, and professional forces to effectively deal with the rural development issues, but there were still problems such as fragmented policies and excessive reliance on subsidies. Based on the national conditions, the Mainland China should learn from the experience and avoid the lessons from the five dimensions of policy, stakeholders, industry, culture, and ecology, build a localized path of coordinated development, and promote the endogenous development of rural revitalization.

     

/

返回文章
返回