基于村民满意度的农村集体产权制度改革绩效评估以福建省为例

Performance Evaluation of the Rural Collective Property Rights System Reform Based on the Villagers’ SatisfactionA Case Study of Fujian Province

  • 摘要:
    目的/意义 通过评价农村集体产权制度改革的村民满意度,丰富改革政策绩效评估的研究视角和研究内容,推进农村改革全面深化。
    方法/过程 基于村民满意度视角评估农村集体产权制度改革绩效,构建政策全过程维度的村民满意度评价指标体系,运用2021—2022年福建省41个农村固定观察点共803份有效样本,使用主客观组合赋权法、满意度指数和四分图模型开展评估。
    结果/结论 结果显示,福建省农村集体产权制度改革政策绩效的村民满意度指数为3.3364,折合百分制为66.73%,属于中等偏上水平。四分图诊断得出村民对制度设计和政策执行的满意度较高,实施效果的满意度有待提高,改革的经济效益不够显著,存在集体经济发展动力不足等问题。据此提出发展壮大农村新型集体经济、加大对改革的制度供给与政策扶持、提升村民对改革的参与度等政策建议。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective/Meaning By evaluating the villagers’ satisfaction with the reform of the rural collective property rights system, the research perspective and research content of the performance evaluation of the reform policies could be enriched, in order to promote the comprehensive deepening of the rural reform.
    Methods/Procedures Based on the perspective of villagers’ satisfaction, the performance of the rural collective property rights system reform was evaluated, and the evaluation index system of villagers’ satisfaction in the whole process of policy was constructed. By using a total of 803 valid samples from 41 rural fixed observation points in Fujian Province from 2021 to 2022, the evaluation was carried out by using the subjective-objective combination weighting method, satisfaction index and quadrant diagram model.
    Results/Conclusions The results showed that: the satisfaction index of villagers in the performance of the reform policies of the rural collective property rights system in Fujian Province was 3.3364 (which could be converted into a centesimal system of 66.73%), which belonged to the upper medium level. The diagnosis of the quadrifid graph showed that the villagers were more satisfied with the system design and policy implementation, while the satisfaction with the implementation effect needed to be improved, and the economic benefits of the reform were not significant enough. Moreover, there existed some problems such as the insufficient impetus for the collective economic development. According to this, the countermeasures were put forward, such as developing and expanding the new rural collective economy, increasing the institutional supply and policy support for the reform, and enhancing the participation of villagers in the reform, etc.

     

/

返回文章
返回