中国农户可持续生计的研究热点与趋势基于CiteSpace的可视化分析

Research Hotspots and Trends of the Sustainable Livelihoods of Rural Households in ChinaVisual Analysis Based on CiteSpace

  • 摘要:
      目的/意  农户可持续生计与“三农”问题息息相关,梳理中国该领域的研究热点和趋势有助于总结近20年中国农户生计和农业发展的成功经验,从而为更好地践行乡村振兴战略献计献策。
      方法/过程  以2000—2022年间(截至2022年3月31日)CNKI数据库中检索出的相关文献为基础数据,运用CiteSpace可视化软件,分析中国农业可持续生计研究的变化和现状,以此反映中国农户可持续生计的变化。
      结果/结论  2000—2022年间,该项研究的载文量一直在增长;研究涉及学科集中于农业经济、公共管理和社会学;研究关键词中心性较高;形成了11个聚类和3类研究主题;这20年依据研究热点的不同可大致分为3个时期,即发展农业生产时期、生态农业时期、脱贫攻坚和乡村振兴时期。综观20年来的研究历程,该领域研究成果丰硕但缺乏理论创新以及农户生计的动态、宏观研究。未来应加强理论创新和动态宏观研究,巩固生态农业和脱贫攻坚成果,为乡村振兴战略添砖加瓦。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective/Meaning  The sustainable livelihood of rural households is closely related to the issue of “agriculture, rural areas and farmers”. Sorting out the research hotspots and trends in this field in China is helpful to summarize the successful experience of the rural households’ livelihood and the agricultural development in China in the past 20 years, so as to provide suggestions for better implementing the rural revitalization strategy.
      Methods/Procedures  Based on the relevant literature retrieved from the CNKI database during the years from 2000 to 2022 (up to March 31, 2022), the CiteSpace visualization software was used to analyze the changes and current situation of the research on agricultural sustainable livelihood in China, so as to reflect the changes of the sustainable livelihoods of rural households in China.
      Results/Conclusions  During the years from 2000 to 2022, the number of papers in the study has been growing; the research involved the disciplines which mainly focused on the agricultural economy, public management and sociology; and the research keywords had high centrality, forming 11 clusters and 3 research topics. According to different research hotspots, these 20 years could be roughly divided into three periods, namely, the period of developing agricultural production, the period of ecological agriculture, the period of poverty alleviation and the period of rural revitalization. By taking a comprehensive view of the research process in the past 20 years, the research results in this field were abundant but lack of theoretical innovation and dynamic macro research on the livelihood of rural households. Therefore, in the future, the theoretical innovation and dynamic macro research should be strengthened, and the achievements in the ecological agriculture and poverty alleviation should be consolidated to contribute to the rural revitalization strategy.

     

/

返回文章
返回