县域乡村振兴发展指标体系构建及其评价基于福建省75个涉农县(市/区)的实证

Construction and Evaluation of the Index System for the Rural Revitalization and Development in CountiesBased on the Empirical Study of 75 Agriculture-related Counties (Cities) in Fujian Province

  • 摘要:
      目的/意义   乡村振兴不仅是村庄的振兴,更是县域的全面振兴,探索构建适用于县域尺度的乡村振兴评价指标体系,以进一步促进乡村振兴和县域经济发展。
      方法/过程   围绕乡村振兴战略的总要求,从产业兴旺、生态宜居、乡风文明、治理有效、生活富裕5个方面,构建了25个县域乡村振兴发展评价指标,基于福建省2015—2019年75个涉农县(市/区)的面板数据,应用熵值法和TOPSIS法对县域乡村振兴发展水平进行综合评价。
      结果/结论   研究表明:福建省各县域的乡村振兴实施水平总体呈波动上升趋势,但各区域间仍存在较大的差异;整体上全省县域乡村振兴发展指数依然不高,各个方面的协调推进程度还有待提升。据此提出加强顶层设计、定期进行实施水平评价、重视生态环境治理等政策建议。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective/Meaning   The rural revitalization is not only the revitalization of villages, but also the overall revitalization of counties. It is of great significance to explore and build a county-scale evaluation index system for the rural revitalization to promote the rural revitalization and the economic development of counties.
      Methods/Procedures   Based on the general requirements of the rural revitalization strategy, 25 evaluation indicators for the rural revitalization and development in counties were constructed from five aspects including the industrial prosperity, livable ecology, rural culture and civilization, effective governance, and rich life. Then, based on the panel data of 75 agriculture-related counties (cities and districts) in Fujian Province from 2015 to 2019, the entropy method and TOPSIS method were used to comprehensively evaluate the development level of rural revitalization in counties.
      Results/Conclusions   The research showed that the implementation level of rural revitalization in all counties of Fujian Province showed an overall trend of fluctuation and rise, but there were great differences among different regions. On the whole, the development index of rural revitalization in all counties of Fujian Province was still not high, and the degree of coordination and promotion in all aspects needed to be improved. Accordingly, the policy suggestions were put forward including strengthening the top-level design, regularly evaluating the implementation level, and attaching importance to the ecological and environmental governance, etc.

     

/

返回文章
返回